Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike B.'s avatar

Your piece makes a strong case for shifting back to deliberate, resilient infrastructure as nation-building. It's a fair point, especially with aging assets and new needs like Arctic ports. The federal side is moving on this, though. The Parliamentary Budget Officer's September update estimates $159 billion in infrastructure spending from 2025-26 to 2029-30. That's significant, but execution often lags due to coordination hurdles you mentioned. The real question is whether it prioritizes those enduring, place-specific projects over short-term wins.

Kathleen's avatar

Great article! Your framing of the current and future focus is absolutely required. And, it's all possible. There are also - as referenced - some small hurdles in the way, but most are simply attitudinal. If CDNs can think past the end of their driveway, they can/will and have come together to build the future. We're at that juncture where much is changing more quickly than a season and time is of the essence.

I'm new to your Substack and have a number of chapters to catch-up on. Thanks for this work!

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?